BRUSSELS — The UK and European Union have agreed to restart formal talks on defence cooperation, signalling a cautious but notable shift in post-Brexit relations amid mounting global security concerns.
Officials on both sides confirmed that discussions will focus on access to shared defence initiatives, joint procurement programmes, and intelligence coordination. While no formal agreements are expected in the immediate term, the move reflects a growing recognition of shared strategic challenges.
British officials framed the talks as pragmatic rather than political, stressing that national sovereignty would remain intact. EU representatives echoed the sentiment, describing security as an area where “practical cooperation outweighs ideological differences.”
The talks come against the backdrop of the ongoing war in Ukraine, instability in the Middle East, and increased cyber threats across Europe. Defence analysts say these pressures have encouraged closer alignment between London and Brussels, even after years of strained relations.
Under current arrangements, the UK is excluded from several EU defence funding mechanisms. British negotiators are seeking pathways that would allow limited participation without reopening broader Brexit agreements.
In Westminster, the announcement drew mixed reactions. Supporters argue that enhanced cooperation will strengthen Europe’s collective security and benefit UK defence industries. Critics warn against what they describe as “backdoor reintegration” with EU structures.
Industry leaders have welcomed the talks, noting that joint projects could reduce costs and speed up procurement timelines. Defence manufacturers have long argued that fragmented systems weaken Europe’s overall military readiness.
Security experts caution that progress will depend on trust, which remains fragile after years of political tension. However, several former diplomats say defence may be one of the few areas where genuine progress is possible.
While the talks remain exploratory, both sides appear keen to avoid public disputes. Officials emphasised that discussions would be technical, not symbolic, and focused on outcomes rather than headlines.
The renewed dialogue suggests that, when it comes to security, geography and shared threats may matter more than past divisions.
