LONDON — Reform UK has launched a legal challenge against the government over proposals that could delay local elections, arguing that any postponement would undermine democratic accountability.
The party filed papers at the High Court claiming that delays would deny voters their right to choose local representatives on schedule. Government officials have said changes are being considered to align electoral timetables with administrative reforms.
Reform UK leader figures described the move as a defence of “basic democratic principles,” accusing ministers of prioritising convenience over public participation.
The government has not confirmed whether elections will be postponed but has cited logistical pressures, boundary reviews, and cost concerns as reasons for reviewing timelines.
Constitutional experts say the case raises important questions about electoral law and the balance of power between central and local government. While Parliament has authority over election dates, courts may examine whether changes are proportionate.
Local councils have expressed mixed views. Some warn that rushed elections could create confusion, while others insist that delays risk weakening public trust.
The case is expected to be heard in the coming weeks and could set a precedent for future electoral changes. Observers say the outcome may influence how governments approach election scheduling during periods of reform.
